Bonus EV & Game Contribution Comparison
18+ only. Contains affiliate links — we may earn a commission. Not for residents of the US, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Australia, Ontario or Vietnam. Not legal or financial advice.
The same bonus can imply very different turnover across eligible games. Edit contribution and house edge for each of three hypothetical rows to compare the arithmetic. A lower house edge alone does not imply lower clearing cost when contribution also falls. These are invented scenarios, not real game terms or Mint offers.
Example inputs: replace with your own figures
Result
| Credited wagering requirement (each game) | 3,000 |
|---|
| Hypothetical game | Contribution | House edge | Real turnover | Expected loss | Nominal bonus EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100% | 3% | 3,000 | 90 | 10 |
| B | 50% | 1% | 6,000 | 60 | 40 |
| C | 10% | 0.5% | 30,000 | 150 | -50 |
18+ · Educational tool. All calculations run in your browser. Examples are not casino rates.
All three rows are hypothetical and editable. A comparison of modeled costs does not establish that a game is eligible or that a bonus can be completed.
How it is calculated
- Credited wagering R = bonus × multiplier, or (bonus + deposit) × multiplier when the requirement covers both. Deposit is optional; enter 0 if absent.
- For each game with contribution c%, real turnover T = R / (c / 100). Expected loss L = T × (house edge / 100). Nominal expected value EV = bonus − L. All amounts use the same currency.
- A 0% contribution means an excluded game and cannot clear a positive requirement; it is rejected rather than shown as a finite turnover.
- Each row assumes all required turnover is completed and the entire bonus becomes cashable. EV is nominal bonus less unconditional expected cost, not expected withdrawable balance. This model omits variance, bust/completion probability, expiry, maximum bets, cashout caps and other restrictions.
18+ · No formula removes the house edge. Do not chase losses; set limits and only use money you can afford to lose. Help and limits.
Related reading
- Single-game wagering requirement calculator
- Read the wagering terms
- Understand bonus categories
- Set a session budget
Frequently asked questions
Why compare contribution and edge together?
Expected cost per credited unit is (house edge %) / (contribution %). A low-edge game with a very low contribution can cost more per credited unit than a higher-edge game.
Does a positive EV guarantee a profit?
No. You may run out of funds before completing playthrough. Bonus restrictions can further reduce value. No scenario recommends gambling or claims a winning strategy.
How does this differ from the wagering calculator?
The wagering calculator evaluates one game. This tool holds the bonus terms fixed and compares three editable hypothetical games side by side.
Ready to try Mint.io?
Review the terms and set limits before deciding whether to gamble. Read our full Mint.io review, set a budget, and play responsibly.
- Deposit & withdraw in USDT or USDC: no price swings
- No code needed: rewards in $MNTD token: rakeback, daily rewards, MINT Status staking
- Casino, sportsbook & predictions in one account
18+ · Sponsored · T&Cs apply · Not available in restricted regions
A small independent team that reads operator help pages, terms and third-party reviews, and links sources for every claim. We are not lawyers or financial advisers. We may earn affiliate commissions. About us & how we rate