18+ only · Gambling involves risk of loss · We earn commissions from some links · Disclosure

Mines Multipliers Explained: Formula & Full Table

Updated 5 min readBy the CryptoPlay Guide Editorial Team

18+ only. Contains affiliate links — we may earn a commission. Not for residents of the US, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Australia, Ontario or Vietnam. Not legal or financial advice.

In this guide (6)

Mines hides mines among tiles. Reveal a safe tile to advance the payout; reveal a mine and lose the round’s stake. A cashout pays the displayed gross multiplier, including the stake. This guide builds the payout formula and a complete example table; the Mines odds guide covers survival probabilities and board verification in more detail.

18+ only. Use only money you can afford to lose. A bigger multiplier compensates for a less likely outcome; it does not create a winning strategy.

Derive the multiplier from combinations

Assume N uniformly shuffled tiles, M mines and K distinct picks, with no information revealing the hidden positions. Of the C(N,K) possible sets of K tiles, C(N−M,K) contain only safe tiles. Therefore:

P(K safe) = C(N−M,K) / C(N,K)

Equivalently, multiply the remaining safe share at each pick: P = ∏(N−M−i)/(N−i) for i from 0 to K−1. Order does not change the result. Here C(n,k) = n! / (k! × (n−k)!). For a fixed cashout at K, the fair gross multiplier F solves P × F = 1, so F = 1/P.

If an illustrative proportional house edge h applies to the round, the example multiplier is G = (1−h)/P. Net profit on a successful stake b is b × (G−1); losing the round costs b. Zero picks returns the untouched stake at 1× in this model, without charging an edge. If K exceeds N−M, success is impossible and no winning multiplier exists.

Worked example: 3 mines and 2 safe picks

On 25 tiles, survival is (22/25) × (21/24) = 462/600 = 77/100 = 77%. The combinations give the same answer: C(22,2)/C(25,2) = 231/300.

The fair multiplier is 100/77 ≈ 1.298701×. With an example 1% edge, G = 0.99/(77/100) = 99/77 ≈ 1.285714×. On a hypothetical stake of 10 currency units, a successful round returns about 12.857143 in total, or 2.857143 net profit; a failed round loses 10. Expected net return is 0.77 × 12.857143 − 10 ≈ −0.10 units. These are computed examples, not Mint rates.

Full multiplier table: 25 tiles, example 1% edge

Each column covers every feasible safe-pick count for that mine count. Values are gross multipliers, rounded to six decimal places. A dash means more picks than safe tiles. There is no row for 25 picks because every column has at least one mine. Zero picks is the untouched stake, not a paid winning round.

Safe picks1 mine3 mines5 mines10 mines24 mines
01.000000×1.000000×1.000000×1.000000×1.000000×
11.031250×1.125000×1.237500×1.650000×24.750000×
21.076087×1.285714×1.563158×2.828571×—
31.125000×1.478571×1.997368×5.004396×—
41.178571×1.712030×2.584830×9.174725×—
51.237500×1.997368×3.392589×17.515385×—
61.302632×2.349845×4.523452×35.030769×—
71.375000×2.790441×6.138971×73.953846×—
81.455882×3.348529×8.500113×166.396154×—
91.546875×4.066071×12.041827×404.104945×—
101.650000×5.004396×17.515385×1,077.613187×—
111.767857×6.255495×26.273077×3,232.839560×—
121.903846×7.961538×40.869231×11,314.938462×—
132.062500×10.350000×66.412500×49,031.400000×—
142.250000×13.800000×113.850000×294,188.400000×—
152.475000×18.975000×208.725000×3,236,072.400000×—
162.750000×27.107143×417.450000×——
173.093750×40.660714×939.262500×——
183.535714×65.057143×2,504.700000×——
194.125000×113.850000×8,766.450000×——
204.950000×227.700000×52,598.700000×——
216.187500×569.250000×———
228.250000×2,277.000000×———
2312.375000×————
2424.750000×————

The table applies G = 0.99 × C(25,K)/C(25−M,K) before rounding. It assumes no maximum payout cap. Six displayed decimals are for comparison; an actual game may round differently or cap returns, changing the effective edge. The final feasible row can have a large multiplier because the full safe sequence is rare. Recalculate a different board or edge with the Mines odds calculator.

Why patterns and stopping systems do not change EV

At any fixed positive feasible pick count, P × G = 0.99. Expected net return per unit initially staked is P × G − 1 = −0.01. Increasing mines or picks changes the distribution of results while this modeled expectation stays fixed. Corners, diagonals, repeated tile patterns and past rounds provide no location information under uniform independent boards.

After K ≥ 1 safe picks, with another safe tile remaining, the next-pick survival chance is (N−M−K)/(N−K). Meanwhile the next gross multiplier is the current one multiplied by (N−K)/(N−M−K). Those factors cancel in conditional expected gross value. Even adapting the exit to the revealed safe tiles cannot improve the model’s expectation after committing to at least one pick; the board is finite and hidden tiles remain equivalent. Choosing not to start avoids that round’s expected loss. Changing stakes after a loss does not improve return per unit wagered.

Auto-cashout is an exit instruction

Where supported, auto-cashout can mean stopping after a selected number of safe reveals, or at a multiplier mapped to such a count. Check the actual trigger: Mines has discrete steps, so a multiplier target need not coincide with an available step. Do not assume every game offers this feature or that it automatically reveals tiles.

If the trigger is K safe picks, the same P and G apply. A mine before K still loses the round. Automation can help follow an exit decision but does not raise survival probability, remove a payout cap or guarantee execution during a technical fault. Check interruption and settlement rules directly; no operator-specific feature is asserted here.

Keep a separate session limit

A round cashout setting is different from a session loss limit. Use the bankroll and session calculator to turn an affordable-to-lose total into fixed session limits. Stop before a stake could exceed the remaining loss allowance, and do not increase limits to chase losses. Responsible gambling support is available if stopping feels difficult.

MINT Status staking calculator

See what a staking level needs, with example numbers.

Frequently asked questions

Does 1% describe Mint’s Mines edge?

No. The table is a mathematical example, not any operator’s payout schedule. Verify the game rules, rounding and caps separately.

Can choosing a pattern improve expected value?

Not under uniform hidden mine placement and the stated payout model. Every still-hidden tile is equivalent; a stopping rule changes risk, not the house edge per stake.

Does auto-cashout guarantee a return?

No. A mine before the chosen safe-pick count loses the stake. Check whether the game offers an automatic exit and how it defines the trigger.

Ready to try Mint.io?

Compare the actual game rules and payout rounding before deciding whether to gamble. Read our full Mint.io review, set a budget, and play responsibly.

Mint.io: the stablecoin casino we review
  • Deposit & withdraw in USDT or USDC: no price swings
  • No code needed: rewards in $MNTD token: rakeback, daily rewards, MINT Status staking
  • Casino, sportsbook & predictions in one account
Review Mint game rules ↗

18+ · Sponsored · T&Cs apply · Not available in restricted regions

CryptoPlay Guide Editorial Team
CryptoPlay Guide Editorial Team
Facts last checked:

A small independent team that reads operator help pages, terms and third-party reviews, and links sources for every claim. We are not lawyers or financial advisers. We may earn affiliate commissions. About us & how we rate